May 6, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT MAGISTRATES MUST EXERCISE JUDICIOIUS APPLICATION OF MIND UNDER SECTION 156(3) OF CRPC

A two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice M.R. Shah and Justice Sanjiv Khanna passed a Judgment dated 04.05.2023 in the case of ‘Kailash Vijayvargiya vs Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri and others, Criminal Appeal…

READ MORE
May 6, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT POLICE IS NOT EMPOWERED TO ORDER FOR FURTHER / RE-INVESTIGATION OF A CRIME, AS SUCH POWERS LIE WITH THE CONCERNED MAGISTRATE OR HIGH COURT

A Two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Sajay Karol passed a Judgment dated 03.05.2023 in Peethambaran v State of Kerala & Anr in Criminal Appeal No. 1381 of 2023 and held that the Police…

READ MORE
May 6, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT LOWER COURTS ERRED IN HOLDING TRANSFER OF PROPERTY VOID, WITHOUT FRAMING ANY ISSUES THEREOF

A Two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice M.R. Shah and Justice C.T. Ravikumar passed a Judgment dated 04-05-2023 in the matter of Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs. Vs Shri Tejrao…

READ MORE
May 6, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THE BUYER ENTITLED TO REFUND OF DOUBLE THE ADVANCE AMOUNT, AS THE SELLER FAILED TO EXECUTE SALE DEED WITHIN THE STIPULATED TIME

Recently, a two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice M.R. Shah and Justice C.T. Ravikumar passed a judgment dated 28.04.2023 in T.D. Vivek Kumar & Anr.  v. Ranbir Chaudhary in Civil Appeal Nos….

READ MORE
April 29, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT HIGH COURT ERRED IN GOING BEYOND THE LIMITED SCOPE OF REVISION UNDER THE DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 BY WRONGLY HOLDING THE APPELLANT GUILTY OF FILING MIS-PLEADINGS IN COURT

Recently, a two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Sanjay Kumar passed a judgment dated 25.04.2023 in Kusum Lata Sharma v. Arvind Singh in Civil Appeal No. 3111 of…

READ MORE
April 29, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT AN UNSTAMPED ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IS NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER LAW

In a recent case of M/S. N.N. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs M/S. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal No(s). 3802-3803 of 2020, a five Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of…

READ MORE
April 28, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS BUYER LIABLE TO PAY STAMP DUTY AND REGISTRATION CHARGES ON THE VALUE OF THE ENTIRE PROPERTY INCLUDING MOVABLE ASSETS ATTACHED THERETO

In a recent case of The Sub Registrar, Amudalavalasa & Anr. Vs M/S Dankuni Steels Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal No(S). 3134-3135 of 2023, a two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice…

READ MORE
April 28, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT A CHARGESHEET CANNOT BE FILED DURING THE PENDENCY OF AN INVESTIGATION, AS IT WOULD DEPRIVE THE ACCUSED OF HIS RIGHT TO DEFAULT BAIL

A two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Krishna Murari and Justice C.T. Ravikumar passed a Judgment dated 26.04.2023 in the case of ‘Ritu Chhabaria vs Union of India and Ors, Writ…

READ MORE
April 28, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT REITERATES THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH A MARRIAGE CAN BE DISSOLVED ON THE GROUNDS OF IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN AND CRUELTY

A two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court presided by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice  J. B. Pardiwala passed a Judgment dated 26.04.2023 in Shri Rakesh Raman Versus Smt. Kavita, Civil Appeal No. 2012 of 2013 and made observations regarding the circumstances…

READ MORE
April 26, 2023 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT ISSUES DIRECTIONS TO HIGH COURTS AND DISTRICT COURTS FOR FORMATION OF GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEES TO ADDRESS ISSUES FACED BY ADVOCATES

A two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice M.R. Shah and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanulla passed a Judgment dated 20.04.2023 in ‘District Bar Association, Dehradun vs Ishwar Sandilya & Ors, MA No. 859…

READ MORE