September 7, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS MANDATORY PENALTY FOR DEFICIT STAMP DUTY

INTRODUCTION A two- Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice S.V.N Bhatti passed an Order dated 02.09.2024 in N.M. Theerthegowda Vs. Y.M. Ashok Kumar and Others in Civil Appeal…

READ MORE
August 31, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT RULES THAT THE DOMINANT PURPOSE OF PURCHASING A FLAT CAN ONLY BE DETERMINED AFTER EXAMINING THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASE

A two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Pankaj Mithal passed a Judgment dated 23.08.2024 in the matter of Omkar Realtors And Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Kushalraj Land…

READ MORE
August 31, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

Navigating Trademark Disputes: The Delhi High Court’s Approach in Prakash Pipes Limited v. Jaiswal Traders

This Article deals with a matter before Delhi High Court titled as M/S Prakash Pipes Limited v. M/S Jaiswal Traders Through Its Proprietor Mr. Chandan Jaiswal & Anr.that deals with withdrawal of a suit. It…

READ MORE
August 31, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE DELHI HIGH COURT’S DENIAL OF SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR WOMEN UNDER PMLA

Introduction A two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice B.R. Gavi and Justice K.V. Vishwanathan passed an Order dated 27.08.2024 in Criminal Appeal No. 3522 Of 2024 [Arising Out Of SLP(Criminal) No. 10778…

READ MORE
August 31, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF PENSION CLAIMS IN CASE OF DIABILITY

Case Background: A very interesting matter came before the High Court of Delhi titled as “Ex Sgt Laxmi Narayan Pandey Retd V. Union Of India”. The Petitioner, Ex SGT Laxmi Narayan Pandey, joined the Indian…

READ MORE
August 31, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT REJECTES BAIL OF THE RESPONDENT AS ALLEGATIONS INVOLVED MISUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDS AND SERIOUS ECONOMIC OFFENCES

In the matter of Manik Madhukar Sarve & Ors. Vs Vitthal Damuji Meher & Ors. Criminal Appeal No. 3573 of 2024 arising from Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3945 of 2022, a two Judge Bench…

READ MORE
August 31, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT STATES AGAIN THAT COURTS SHOULD INTERFERE IN AN ARBITRAL AWARD ONLY WHEN IT GOES AGAINST THE TERMS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES

A two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Pankaj Mithal passed a judgement dated 23.08.2024 in Pam Developments Private Limited V. The State of West Bengal…

READ MORE
August 24, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT UNDERSTANDS THE DIFFICULTY OF OBTAINING SURETIES FOR SEVERAL FIRs PENDING IN DIFFERENT STATES IN A CRIMINAL MATTER

A two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan passed a judgement dated 22.08.2024 in the matter of Girish Gandhi v. The State of Uttar Pradesh…

READ MORE
August 24, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE ORDER OF HIGH COURT AND REINSTATES THE SINGLE JUDGE’S ORDER WITH A MODIFICATION

A two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah passed a Judgment dated 22.08.2024 in the matter of Swati Priyadarshini vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors….

READ MORE
August 24, 2024 In Advovacy, Blog

DELHI HIGH COURT HOLDS DISPUTE PERTAINING TO QUANTUM OF LIABILITY TO PAY EXCISE DUTY AS ARBITRABLE

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court Bench comprising of Justice Prateek Jalan passed a Judgment dated 22-08-2024 in the matter of Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. Vs Paramount Communications Ltd. O.M.P. (COMM) 355/2024 and observed that the…

READ MORE