April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

COURTS ARE REQUIRED TO FRAME POINTS FOR DETERMINATION EVEN IN EX- PARTE SUITS

  INTRODUCTION In PRAMOD SHROFF  vs MOHAN SINGH CHOPRA 2026  INSC 378 decided on 16 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising  of Justice SANJAY KAROL and Justice AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH clarified a crucial…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

5 IMPORTANT PIECES OF EVIDENCE TO GATHER AFTER A REAR‑END IMPACT

Rear end collisions are among the most common roadway accidents, yet their consequences are often underestimated. While these crashes may seem straightforward, the aftermath can involve serious injuries, disputed liability, and complex insurance discussions. The…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT REFUSES TO REGISTER A SEPARATE FIR AGAINST WIFE AND HER FAMILY FOR GIVING DOWRY

INTRODUCTION In Rahul Gupta vs Station House Officer 2026 INSC 374 decided on 16 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, clarified a crucial principle related…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

REJECTION OF PLAINT VS. BAR TO SUBSEQUENT SUIT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ORDER VII RULE 11 AND ORDER II RULE 2 CPC.

INTRODUCTION In S. Valliammai & Ors. v. S. Ramanathan & Ors. (decided on 16 April 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, reiterated that rejection of a…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN AND ABUSE OF PROCESS: SUPREME COURT ENDS DECADE-LONG MATRIMONIAL LITIGATION

INTRODUCTION In XXX v. YYY, SLP (Civil) No. 28311 of 2024), decided on 7 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, exercised its extraordinary powers under Article…

READ MORE
February 21, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: MOTHER DOES NOT HAVE LEGAL RIGHT TO SHARE IF THE SON DIES INTESTATE LEAVING BEHIND WIFE AND CHILDREN

The High Court of Karnataka, in a Judgment delivered on February 2, 2026, addressed a significant error in the application of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, regarding the inheritance rights of Christian legal heirs. The…

READ MORE
February 21, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

FORGED DEGREES, SUPPRESSED ANTECEDENTS AND PERVERSE BAIL: SUPREME COURT REASSERTS DISCIPLINE IN GRANT OF LIBERTY

INTRODUCTION In Zeba Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others, reported as 2026 INSC 144, the Supreme Court of India, by Judgment dated 11 February 2026, delivered a significant ruling on the annulment of…

READ MORE
February 21, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT HOMEBUYER CANNOT BE COMPELLED TO ACCEPT POSSESSION WITHOUT OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE OBTAINED BY BUILDER

Introduction The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a crucial judgment addressing the rights of homebuyers against real estate developers. The decision pertained to a batch of civil appeals, primarily titled Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v….

READ MORE
February 21, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

COOPERATION DOES NOT MEAN SELF-INCRIMINATION: SUPREME COURT SHIELDS ARTICLE 20(3) IN NDPS ANTICIPATORY BAIL

INTRODUCTION In Vinay Kumar Gupta v. State of Madhya Pradesh, Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 20215 of 2025, decided on 16 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar…

READ MORE
February 2, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

DEMOLITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY MUST BE BASED ON CLEAR STATUTORY GROUNDS AND CONSIDERATION OF ALL FACTORS

Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s Judgment in M/s Aarsuday Projects & Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Jogen Chowdhury and others (Civil Appeal Nos. 2920, 2921 and 2922‑2923 of 2018) reconciling private property rights with environmental preservation and cultural…

READ MORE