May 24, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE COURT ATTACKS THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THE RULE OF LAW: SUPREME COURT

Introduction On May 9, 2025, A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court presided by Justice Masih and Justice Gavai, while deciding the case “Tata Mohan Rao v. S. Venkateshwarlu and Others etc.” arising out…

READ MORE
May 24, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Arbitration Mandate in Trademark Dispute

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of K. Mangayarkarasi & Anr. v. N.J. Sundaresan & Anr. (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13012 of 2025), has clearly upheld the primacy…

READ MORE
May 24, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES CONDITIONAL ALLOTMENT UNDER STATUTORY SCHEME IS NOT A SALE

The Hon’ble Supreme Court acquitted a man convicted under Section 302 IPC, holding that the “last seen together” theory, without corroborative evidence, is insufficient for conviction. The Bench, comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Sanjay…

READ MORE
May 24, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES CONDITIONAL ALLOTMENT UNDER STATUTORY SCHEME IS NOT A SALE

The Judgment in the Case of The State of Telangana & Ors. vs. Dr. Pasupuleti Nirmala Hanumantha Rao Charitable Trust, Civil Appeal No. 5321 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 25818 of 2023)…

READ MORE
May 10, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS TRIAL COURT’S POWER TO SUMMON ACCUSED

In a significant ruling that reinforces the judicial authority to summon additional accused during trial, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr., 2025 INSC 634, (SLP (Criminal) No. 1891…

READ MORE
May 9, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

A slight modification of an existing design does not confer exclusive rights.

Introduction: The case of Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare vs. Amigo Brushes Private Limited & Anr. revolves around an alleged infringement of a registered toothbrush design. The plaintiff, a global healthcare company, sought an interlocutory injunction…

READ MORE
May 9, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

Stop Insulting Constitution By Denying West UP Even A Single High Court Bench

 If we jog our memory a little back, we can recall how even the then former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon while he was UN Secretary General had slammed UP as “rape and crime…

READ MORE
May 5, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

Supreme Court Restores FIR in Property Dispute: Emphasizes Comprehensive Investigation in Cross FIR Cases

A Two Judge Bench comprising of Judges Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan passed a Judgment dated April 29,2025 in the case of Punit Beriwala vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Criminal…

READ MORE
May 5, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Cases Involving Disputed Limitation and Power of Attorney

A Two Judge Bench comprising of Judges Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan passed a Judgment dated April 29,2025 in the case of P.Kumarakurubaran Versus P.Narayana & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 5622 of 2025…

READ MORE
May 3, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

HOLDING HANDS OF FEMALE STUDENTS IN COMPUTER LAB WHILE USING MOUSE CLEARLY FALL UNDER POCSO ACT: SC

While taking a very grim view of a teacher holding the hands of female students, the Supreme Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled X etc vs Rajesh Kumar &…

READ MORE