April 24, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPPRESSION OF MATERIAL FACTS JUSTIFIES REVOCATION OF PROBATE: SUPREME COURT RESTORES TRIAL COURT’S ORDER

INTRODUCTION In S. Leorex Sebastian & Anr. v. Sarojini & Ors., 2026 INSC 400, decided on 21 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi, examined the…

READ MORE
April 24, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS LIFE SENTENCE ON THE BASIS OF SINGLE CREDIBLE WITNESS

INTRODUCTION In Adalat Yadav & Anr. v. State of Bihar, 2026 INSC 403, decided on 22 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, reaffirmed a settled…

READ MORE
April 24, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

FROM CONVICTION TO ACQUITTAL: THE ROLE OF RELIABLE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL LAW

INTRODUCTION In The State of Assam v. Moinul Haque@ Monu (decided on 16 April 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, decided by the Supreme Court of India,…

READ MORE
April 24, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

PREMATURE REJECTION, DENIED JUSTICE: REVISITING ORDER VII RULE 11

INTRODUCTION In M/s. Marg Limited v. Sushil Lalwani & Ors. (decided on 21 April 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, examined the scope of rejection of…

READ MORE
April 24, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

IBC MECHANISM NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DECREE EXECUTION OR RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court in Anjani Technoplast Ltd. v. Shubh Gautam, 2026 INSC 410, on April 23, 2026, comprising of a Division Bench of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe. clarifying whether a…

READ MORE
April 24, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

MAINTENANCE FOR CHILD CANNOT BE DEMANDED FROM A MAN IF A DNA TEST SHOWS HE IS NOT THE FATHER

          INTRODUCTION  In Nikhat Parveen @ Khusboo Khatoon v. Rafique @ Shillu, 2026 INSC 399, decided on 21 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising of Justice Sanjay Karol and…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

COURTS ARE REQUIRED TO FRAME POINTS FOR DETERMINATION EVEN IN EX- PARTE SUITS

  INTRODUCTION In PRAMOD SHROFF  vs MOHAN SINGH CHOPRA 2026  INSC 378 decided on 16 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising  of Justice SANJAY KAROL and Justice AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH clarified a crucial…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

5 IMPORTANT PIECES OF EVIDENCE TO GATHER AFTER A REAR‑END IMPACT

Rear end collisions are among the most common roadway accidents, yet their consequences are often underestimated. While these crashes may seem straightforward, the aftermath can involve serious injuries, disputed liability, and complex insurance discussions. The…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT REFUSES TO REGISTER A SEPARATE FIR AGAINST WIFE AND HER FAMILY FOR GIVING DOWRY

INTRODUCTION In Rahul Gupta vs Station House Officer 2026 INSC 374 decided on 16 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, clarified a crucial principle related…

READ MORE
April 18, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

REJECTION OF PLAINT VS. BAR TO SUBSEQUENT SUIT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ORDER VII RULE 11 AND ORDER II RULE 2 CPC.

INTRODUCTION In S. Valliammai & Ors. v. S. Ramanathan & Ors. (decided on 16 April 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, reiterated that rejection of a…

READ MORE