preloader
Fexa
  • +91 7893087474
  • contact@theindianlawyer.in
  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
  • Foreigner’s Desk
  • Allied Services
  • Blog
  • International Partners
  • International Alliances
  • Contact Us
  • Awards
  • The Indian Lawyer Legal Tips
  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
  • Foreigner’s Desk
  • Allied Services
  • Blog
  • International Partners
  • International Alliances
  • Contact Us
  • Awards
  • The Indian Lawyer Legal Tips
  • India
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • England
  • France
  • Germany
  • Hongkong
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Kenya
  • Newzealand
  • Oman
  • Portugal
  • Qatar
  • Russia
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • SwitzerLand
  • Tanzania
  • UAE
  • Uganda
  • USA
  • Malaysia
  • Thailand
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Egypt
  • Brazil
  • japan
  • austria
  • oman
  • new_zealand
  • Kenya
  • Netherlands
August 30, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS EXPORTERS’ RIGHTS: PROCEDURAL ERRORS CANNOT DEFEAT MEIS BENEFITS

INTRODUCTION On 19 August 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant ruling in M/s Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2025 INSC 1032) (Justice NV Anjaria and Justice Aravind…

READ MORE
August 16, 2025 In Advovacy, Blog

EX PARTE INJUNCTIONS AND THE RULE OF LAW: THE SUPREME COURT’S REAFFIRMATION OF PROCEDURAL SANCTITY

INTRODUCTION The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (SLP (Civil) No. 21747 of 2025)( Justices JB Pardiwala and…

READ MORE

What We Do

  • Our Services
  • Doing Business in India
  • Firm Profile
  • Judgements
  • Blog
  • Pay Now

Latest News

  • SUPREME COURT URGES TO BRING ‘ROMEO-JULIET’ CLAUSE IN POCSO ACT TO SHIELD CONSENSUAL ADOLESCENT RELATIONSHIPS FROM PROSECUTION
  • ROYALTY HIKE UNDER MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT, 1957 OVERRIDES CONTRACTUAL TERMS
  • SUPREME COURT REITERATES WELFARE OF A CHILD IS MANDATORY
  • SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CONVICTION IN KIDNAPPING CASE STATING LACK OF CDR FROM RURAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE IN 2003 IS NOT MATERIAL
  • SUPREME COURT SEEKS ACTION AGAINST ERRANT OFFICERS FOR LOSS OF RECORDS IN 19 YEAR GUJARAT POLICE CASE

Business Overview

  • Doing Business in India
  • Sectoral Overview
  • Investment Opportunities

Useful Links

  • General Information
  • Judgements
  • Statutes and Bare Acts
  • Pay Now

Website Usage

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Connect with Us

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Gallery
  • Join Us

© 2013 - 2026 . Copyright of The Indian Lawyer & Allied Services. All Rights Reserved.