July 11, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT REINFORCE STRICT TIMELINES FOR ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN COMMERCIAL SUITS

INTRODUCTION In M/S. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt.Ltd. v. M/S. Standard Chartered Bank & Anr. (decided on 09 July 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices Sanjay Karol and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, addressed the…

READ MORE
July 11, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

‘MERE NON-COMMUNICATION WITH WIFE NOT CRUELTY’: SUPREME COURT SETS ASIDE HUSBAND’S S.498A CONVICTION OVER WIFE’S SUICIDE

INTRODUCTION In the significant ruling of Jayesh Kanna v The Assistant Commissioner Law and Order (West) Etc Criminal Appeal Nos. 2382 – 2383 Of 2026, involving the scope of cruelty under Section 498A of the…

READ MORE
July 11, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT: MERE PRESENCE OF OFFICER WHEN SUPERIOR ACCEPTED BRIBE NOT ENOUGH TO INFER CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court has reaffirmed in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Versus A.K Gaba Etc Criminal Appeal No(S). 3383-3385 Of 2025, a foundational principle of criminal jurisprudence under the Prevention of Corruption…

READ MORE
July 11, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

SUPREME COURT HOLDS ATTESTATION DOES NOT PROVE GENUINENESS OF A WILL WHEN THERE ARE SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES

INTRODUCTION The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India recently tackled a fascinating question regarding the true value of a registered Will when its surrounding circumstances scream of foul play. In Sardari Lal v. Bishan Dass &…

READ MORE
July 11, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

STATUTORY AMALGAMATION DOES NOT DEFEAT A LANDLORD’S RIGHTS UNDER THE RENT ACT

INTRODUCTION On 9 July 2026, the Supreme Court of India delivered an important Judgment in British Motor Car Company (1939) Ltd. v. M/s Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd. (since merged with Punjab National Bank) & Anr.,…

READ MORE
July 4, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

THE SUPREME COURT REDEFINES MAGISTRATE’S ROLE IN SESSION TRIABLE COMPLAINT CASE

INTRODUCTION In Neeraj Gupta v. Pradeep Kumar Bansal & Ors., 2026 INSC 660, decided on 1 July 2026, by a bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongeikapam Kotiswar Singh, the principal issue before the…

READ MORE
July 4, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

COURTS MUST ORDER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF CHILD ONLY IF NECESSARY; MINIMUM INTRUSION SHOULD BE NORM

Introduction In the case of Sheetal Vasant Thakur v. Chirag Arora (2026 INSC 638), decided by Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh on 11 June 2026, at the intersection of child custody, the…

READ MORE
July 4, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

REMISSION POLICY ISSUED UNDER ARTICLE 161 OVERRIDES STATUTORY POLICY FRAMED UNDER CRPC

Introduction In a significant pronouncement made in the case of Parveen Kumar @ Parveen Chauhan v. State of Haryana, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9920 of 2026, decided on 1st July 2026, the Court clarified…

READ MORE
July 4, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

BETWEEN FREE SPEECH AND DIGITAL DECEPTION: THE JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO AI-GENERATED POLITICAL DEEPFAKES

INTRODUCTION On 1 July 2026, the Delhi High Court delivered an important Judgment in Raghav Chadha v. Ashok Kumar John Doe & Ors., CS(OS) 466/2026, dealing with the growing misuse of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in…

READ MORE
July 4, 2026 In Advovacy, Blog

WHEN TECHNOLOGY CROSSES THE LINE: SAFEGUARDING THE SANCTITY OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING

INTRODUCTION On 2 July 2026, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant Judgment in Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr., 2026 INSC 668, addressing the growing influence of Artificial…

READ MORE